Information about birds, birding, and how to protect birds in the Laramie, Wyoming area, including our local Habitat Heroes program.
 Abstract: Animals can 
require different habitat types throughout their annual cycles. When 
considering habitat prioritization, we need to explicitly consider 
habitat requirements throughout the annual cycle, particularly for 
species of conservation concern. Understanding annual habitat 
requirements begins with quantifying how far individuals move across 
landscapes between key life stages to access required habitats. We 
quantified individual interseasonal movements for greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus;
 hereafter sage-grouse) using radio-telemetry spanning the majority of 
the species distribution in Wyoming. Sage-grouse are currently a 
candidate for listing under the United States Endangered Species Act and
 Wyoming is predicted to remain a stronghold for the species. 
Sage-grouse use distinct seasonal habitats throughout their annual cycle
 for breeding, brood rearing, and wintering. Average movement distances 
in Wyoming from nest sites to summer-late brood-rearing locations were 
8.1 km (SE = 0.3 km; n = 828 individuals) and the average subsequent distances moved from summer sites to winter locations were 17.3 km (SE = 0.5 km; n = 607 individuals). Average nest-to-winter movements were 14.4 km (SE = 0.6 km; n 
= 434 individuals). We documented remarkable variation in the extent of 
movement distances both within and among sites across Wyoming, with some
 individuals remaining year-round in the same vicinity and others moving
 over 50 km between life stages. Our results suggest defining any of our
 populations as migratory or non-migratory is inappropriate as 
individual strategies vary widely. We compared movement distances of 
birds marked using Global Positioning System (GPS) and very high 
frequency (VHF) radio marking techniques and found no evidence that the 
heavier GPS radios limited movement. Furthermore, we examined the 
capacity of the sage-grouse core regions concept to capture seasonal 
locations. As expected, we found the core regions approach, which was 
developed based on lek data, was generally better at capturing the 
nesting locations than summer or winter locations. However, across 
Wyoming the sage-grouse breeding core regions still contained a 
relatively high percentage of summer and winter locations and seem to be
 a reasonable surrogate for non-breeding habitat when no other 
information exists. We suggest that conservation efforts for greater 
sage-grouse implicitly incorporate seasonal habitat needs because of 
high variation in the amount of overlap among breeding core regions and 
non-breeding habitat. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
Abstract: Animals can 
require different habitat types throughout their annual cycles. When 
considering habitat prioritization, we need to explicitly consider 
habitat requirements throughout the annual cycle, particularly for 
species of conservation concern. Understanding annual habitat 
requirements begins with quantifying how far individuals move across 
landscapes between key life stages to access required habitats. We 
quantified individual interseasonal movements for greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus;
 hereafter sage-grouse) using radio-telemetry spanning the majority of 
the species distribution in Wyoming. Sage-grouse are currently a 
candidate for listing under the United States Endangered Species Act and
 Wyoming is predicted to remain a stronghold for the species. 
Sage-grouse use distinct seasonal habitats throughout their annual cycle
 for breeding, brood rearing, and wintering. Average movement distances 
in Wyoming from nest sites to summer-late brood-rearing locations were 
8.1 km (SE = 0.3 km; n = 828 individuals) and the average subsequent distances moved from summer sites to winter locations were 17.3 km (SE = 0.5 km; n = 607 individuals). Average nest-to-winter movements were 14.4 km (SE = 0.6 km; n 
= 434 individuals). We documented remarkable variation in the extent of 
movement distances both within and among sites across Wyoming, with some
 individuals remaining year-round in the same vicinity and others moving
 over 50 km between life stages. Our results suggest defining any of our
 populations as migratory or non-migratory is inappropriate as 
individual strategies vary widely. We compared movement distances of 
birds marked using Global Positioning System (GPS) and very high 
frequency (VHF) radio marking techniques and found no evidence that the 
heavier GPS radios limited movement. Furthermore, we examined the 
capacity of the sage-grouse core regions concept to capture seasonal 
locations. As expected, we found the core regions approach, which was 
developed based on lek data, was generally better at capturing the 
nesting locations than summer or winter locations. However, across 
Wyoming the sage-grouse breeding core regions still contained a 
relatively high percentage of summer and winter locations and seem to be
 a reasonable surrogate for non-breeding habitat when no other 
information exists. We suggest that conservation efforts for greater 
sage-grouse implicitly incorporate seasonal habitat needs because of 
high variation in the amount of overlap among breeding core regions and 
non-breeding habitat. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
No comments:
Post a Comment