The Issue
Of the 9.7 million acres of national forests and grasslands in Wyoming, one-third (3.2 million acres) is managed as Inventoried Roadless Areas. These 110 roadless areas are found on all national forests in the state. Across the U.S. states and territories, nearly 45 million acres are managed as Inventoried Roadless Areas. Inventoried Roadless Areas are lands that lack roads and that may be suitable for management as wilderness areas or other non-standard management areas. Their management is regulated by the Forest Service’s 2001 Roadless Rule. Opponents of the Roadless Rule object to limitations on the economies of communities near national forests, and to the danger of uncontrolled wildfires. Proponents cite the benefits to fisheries, wildlife habitat, biological diversity, and dispersed recreation. In August, the Forest Service proposed a new rule that would rescind the 2001 Roadless Rule. According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement that accompanies this newly proposed rule, road-building, logging, and motorized recreation will increase in Inventoried Roadless Areas, although the exact effects are uncertain.
BackgroundThe 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule was promulgated mainly to control the amount of road-building in undeveloped areas by the Forest Service, which manages a road system with more miles than the US Interstate Highway System. The main rational was to minimize damage from road construction and maintenance and from automobile traffic, which degrade soils, water quality, and habitat for native plants and animals. In addition, the Roadless Rule expands the system of protected lands beyond the wilderness areas, National Parks, and preserves that protect rugged, beautiful, high-elevation areas that are difficult to develop, but that poorly represent mid-elevation ecosystems. The Roadless Rule limits but does not prevent multiple uses of roadless areas. It does not completely prohibit road construction or timber harvesting. Rather, it allows limited developments that address public health and safety, outstanding rights, mineral leases, resource damage, and stewardship.
The Roadless Rule has been controversial since its adoption. Proponents cite the benefits to undeveloped fisheries and wildlife habitat, biological diversity, and dispersed recreation. Opponents object to limitations on road building and timber harvesting that benefit economies in towns near national forests. With the increase in wildfires in recent years, opponents have especially emphasized the need for roads and logging to protect communities. The relationship between wildfires and roadless areas is not straightforward, though: data from across the U.S. and from Wyoming show that fires are more likely to start in roaded areas than in roadless areas, but fires in roaded areas are (on average) slightly smaller and are less likely to grow into large fires. Moreover, proponents of keeping the Roadless Rule point out that it allows local managers to implement developments that reduce wildfire risk.
NOTE: The deadline for either of these steps is the end of the day, Tuesday, October 6th. (The deadline for comments was originally September 21st, but it has been extended to October 6th.)
Review the National Audubon Society’s alert and sign onto Audubon’s letter to the Forest Service, urging that the 2001 Roadless Rule NOT be rescinded.
Submit your own comment through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Points that you might make in your comment are: roadless areas, protected by the Roadless Rule, are important habitat for native plants and animals; the Roadless Rule allows local Forest Service managers flexibility to implement projects to reduce wildfire danger and protect communities; it is not at all clear that allowing roads in roadless areas will reduce wildfire risk.
Forest Service Roadless Area webpage
Federal Register announcement of the newly proposed rule








